Book Report: Dandelion Wine by Ray Bradbury

On nostalgic childhood, except for that chapter about the serial killer

My year-after-college-graduation roommate was in love with Dandelion Wine. We had grown up together–she was my little sister’s age, and thus fell into the category of “annoying” while we were younger. After I went away to college and “re-met” her a few years later, I realized that I really dug her style. I still do. She’s one of the cuter things in the world.

I went through a long dry spell of reading materials during our six months in Peru, mainly because it was so hard to find anything in a book exchange that wasn’t written by Nora Roberts or Tom Clancy. So when we got into Portland to visit my awesome ex-roommate and her adorable 2-year-old, I found myself completely overwhelmed by her bookshelf.

I was looking for something to pass the evening, something pleasant, well-written, meaningful…. I was frozen by indecision when faced with such an array of great books that I’ve always wanted to read. My fingers lit on one, then another classic work of beauty and longing. I bit my lip, tormented by indecision.

I finally settled on a slim, well-loved copy of Dandelion Wine–partly because I knew how much my ex-roommate liked it, and partly because it looked short and I was a bit worried that my attention span had taken a blow. I settled down on the couch with a crocheted afghan pulled up around my neck, and began to read.

So I finally talk about the book here

I haven’t read any Bradbury since I forgot how to spell Fahrenheit 451 in high school. Dandelion Wine is not what I was expecting–a gently nostalgic look at childhood through the lens of Summertime.

Douglas Spaulding takes it upon himself to chronicle the rituals and revelations of summer, from the first pair of New Sneakers, to the loss of his best friend. It’s as though through the very attempt to capture his childhood on paper, however, he destroys its illusion. He realizes that friendships end, people die, and that important rituals cease to have any meaning.

The novel is lusciously written, touching, heartbreaking, haunting…. And then there’s the serial killer chapter that snuck up on me while I was innocently reading in bed. I expected another wistful tale of missed connections or angst-filled childhood revelation. Instead, I found myself suddenly immersed in a heart-pounding chase of terror, where you flee the most terrible thing you can think of, only to find it in the place you thought was the safest.

Did I have nightmares that night? Of course I did. It’s near page 121, if you want to time your bedtime reading around missing it (recommended).

In short, read this book. Carefully.

On not finishing books.

When I was a freshman in high school, we had to write a certain number of book reports on “classics” a quarter in order to get an A. My teacher came up with an idea that was supposed to make reading fun and inspire creativity: we would make book covers for the books we reviewed.

I had a ton of fun making these imaginary book covers (the one for Dune used up all my tan-colored crayons, if I remember correctly), but the project had one flaw which I quickly realized. Book covers by nature provide only a cliffhanger synopsis of book’s first half, therefore, I had no incentive to actually finish a novel that was boring.

Now that I’m an adult who has spent a good part of her life finishing books she wasn’t interested in because of her educational path, I know that I have better things to be doing with my time.

I’ve argued with many people about whether or not I should finish books that I find boring. To me, the question comes down to whether or not the book is good for me. Is celery good for me? Yes, so I will eat it although I find it boring. Is Haruki Murakami good for me? He certainly is popular among professors that I respect, but his random diatribes against feminism annoy me in a manner that far outweighs the annoyance caused by a few sticks of celery.

I once dated a guy who always finished books. When we argued about whether or not it was necessary (we graduated with the same English Lit degree), his main point was that sometimes a mediocre book could be saved by a great ending, and that if you didn’t read to the end, you’d miss the life-changing finale.

My response: I just get pissed off if an author somehow manages to summon up enough talent to pull off a good ending. Why couldn’t s/he have gotten hir act together for the preceding 200 pages?

I’ve often caught my mother in the act of finishing books that she’s not enjoying. Sometimes those books were loaned by someone who’s feelings she doesn’t want to hurt (and I’ll admit I rarely get up the courage to tell people that their taste in books is sucky in comparison to my much more refined tastes), but sometimes she’s just sighed and told me, well, I’ve gotten this far….

A bad book takes so much more time to read than a bad movie. Don’t waste your life, people!

What got me started on this rant? I actually intended to write a book report on Ray Bradbury’s Dandelion Wine (which I liked immensely except for that one night of nightmares), but my opening paragraphs about my high school book report days sent me off on a tangent. Blogging about books + Deschutes Inversion IPA = Tangential posts.

I probably still need more time to process the Bradbury anyway. I’ll post about it tomorrow.